Hayes Letters Rejected As New Evidence; Deliberations Begin
By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN, Associated Press
NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) _ A judge denied an effort Wednesday by attorneys for a Connecticut man charged with killing a woman and her two daughters in a home invasion to reopen their defense based on letters from a co-defendant claiming he had committed numerous murders in the past. The case then went to the jury.
Attorneys for Joshua Komisarjevsky cited letters from Steven Hayes claiming he killed 17 people in the Northeast and committed dozens of drugged date rapes.
Authorities say Komisarjevsky and Hayes broke into the Cheshire home in 2007, beat Dr. William Petit with a bat, tied him and his family up and forced his wife to withdraw money from a bank. The house was doused in gas and set on fire, leading to the girls’ deaths from smoke inhalation.
Hayes was convicted last year of raping and strangling Jennifer Hawke-Petit and killing her daughters. He is on death row.
Jury deliberations began late Wednesday morning.
The letters came to light just before closing arguments Tuesday in New Haven Superior Court. Komisarjevsky’s attorneys say the letters could help their arguments that Hayes was the leader of the crime.
Judge Jon Blue said Wednesday the claims were not corroborated and would actually hurt Komisarjevsky’s case because of claims Hayes makes in the letters about the Connecticut crime. Testimony is reopened to avoid miscarriages of justice, he said.
Blue said Hayes’ claims, if truthful, would make him one of the greatest serial killers in American history. But he said the claims are vague with no dates, locations or other details.
“It certainly means there is no real corroboration of this,” Blue said.
Blue said Hayes would only invoke his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination if called to testify. He said the letters blame Komisarjevsky for much of the home invasion.
“This would be the seal of Mr. Komisarjevsky’s doom,” Blue said.
A prosecutor called the letters unreliable.
Blue also denied a defense motion for a mistrial based on comments prosecutors made during closing arguments.
(Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)